AINewsnow

Anthropic and OpenAI want to embed safety evaluators. Will they really be independent?

This story is from 2026-09-16. It is preserved in the archive; the latest stories are on the live feed.

Anthropic and OpenAI want to embed independent safety evaluators inside their AI labs. Researchers welcome the unprecedented access, but warn meaningful oversight requires transparency, independence, and eventually regulation.

Read the full story at TechCrunch AI ↗

Timeline · 2 reports

  1. 2026-09-17 17:56 · AI Insider
    Anthropic and OpenAI Propose Embedding Independent Safety Evaluators Inside AI Companies
  2. 2026-09-16 21:07 · TechCrunch AI
    Anthropic and OpenAI want to embed safety evaluators. Will they really be independent?

More stories

  1. Anthropic, OpenAI, SpaceXAI, Google sued over call to ‘pace’ AI development — Politico Technology
  2. Gemini Hacked Three Companies in First Known Breakout by Google’s AI — Wall Street Journal Technology
  3. Anthropic selects Accenture as first embedded evaluator to help implement Amodei's slowdown proposal — CNBC Technology
  4. Anthropic mulls new AI model ahead of IPO to counter OpenAI's GPT-6 Astra, says report: What we know — Mint AI
  5. OpenAI ‘ethically hacked’ with help of Anthropic’s Claude chatbot — The Guardian AI
  6. Researchers used Claude to hack OpenAI — Ars Technica AI
  7. Flyweight: open-source C++/CUDA engine for running MoE models bigger than your VRAM on one GPU + system RAM. First PyPI release, looking for contributors. — r/LocalLLaMA
  8. I ran Claude code and Codex in parallel for 15 days. Here's what I found. — r/AI_Agents

Get the daily brief of stories like this at 6:30 every morning →