Continuous batching outperforms static and dynamic batching by up to 2.91x in vLLM
A benchmark using a zero-variance control, five traffic traces, and an engine-vs-scheduler split shows continuous batching in vLLM beats static and dynamic batching by up to 2.91x, clarifying where the gains come from.
Read the full story at Towards Data Science ↗
Timeline · 1 report
- 2026-11-09 16:30 · Towards Data Science
Continuous Batching Beats Static and Dynamic by Up to 2.91× in vLLM