DeepSeek V4.1 Flash vs Claude Haiku 5.5: a 17-task benchmark of the two cheapest tiers
Originally published on the QuickSilver Pro blog . DeepSeek V4.1 Flash and Claude Haiku 5.5 are the two models people reach for when a job runs thousands of times a day: classification, extraction, small code edits, the background calls of an agent. Both are cheap per token. The question is which o…
Read the full story at DEV Community — AI ↗
Timeline · 6 reports
- 2026-11-09 23:32 · r/LocalLLaMA
Same prompt, DeepSeek V4.1 Flash vs Qwen 3.8 FN: 94 tok/s vs 350 tok/s - 2026-11-09 19:49 · r/LocalLLM
RustingStrata vs llama.cpp runs DeepSeek-V4.1-Flash Q2 (249 GB) on a single RTX 3060 12 GB with 30 GB RAM - 2026-11-09 13:47 · r/LocalLLM
DeepSeek V4.1 Flash Unsloth IQ2 at 42 tok/s on one RTX 3090 + 192 GB RAM: Delta Inference Engine 0.94 (native Windows) - 2026-11-09 05:54 · DEV Community — AI
Ollama vs. llama.cpp on the Same GGUF: The 15% Speed Gap Was the Defaults, Not the Engine - 2026-11-08 20:27 · DEV Community — AI
DeepSeek V4.1 Flash API: Clean and Tag 10,000 Comments, and What It Costs - 2026-11-08 03:33 · DEV Community — AI
DeepSeek V4.1 Flash vs Claude Haiku 5.5: a 17-task benchmark of the two cheapest tiers