AINewsnow

Do you think A.I companies should together pause the development of job affecting a.is for a couple of years atleast?

I am not asking about total A.I which i think is not possible, but maybe the job affecting A.I or job affecting parts of A.I models they develop? I think they should if it can be done technically, what do you all think?

Read the full story at r/artificial ↗

Timeline · 1 report

  1. 2026-11-06 16:37 · r/artificial
    Do you think A.I companies should together pause the development of job affecting a.is for a couple of years atleast?

More stories

  1. Election backlash against data centers rattles AI stocks and expansion plans — TechCrunch AI
  2. Anthropic strikes $3.4bn deal for gas-fired generators to power AI data centres — Financial Times AI
  3. OpenAI to keep expanding AI data centers despite election results favoring restrictions — DigiTimes Asia
  4. Tencent AI chief warns AI will soon master biology, raising new safety risks — SCMP China Tech
  5. Hydra-PSIE expands 'Coeziune OM–IA' DOI registry to 39 published works — DEV Community — AI
  6. Developer's 48-Hour Field Notes Detail Free-Tier LLM Batch Job Failures — DEV Community — AI
  7. Apple's John Ternus reportedly pushing for faster AI progress beyond Siri upgrades — Techmeme
  8. US AI Safety Center Staff Now Report to White House, Raising Independence Concerns — AP News

Get the daily brief of stories like this at 6:30 every morning →