AINewsnow

Does anyone else find that GPT Plus deep research is abysmal?

This story is from 2026-09-14. It is preserved in the archive; the latest stories are on the live feed.

GPT Plus's deep research is abysmal. It used to be very good and generate tons of references and insights that were accurate. Now if I asked it to do a literature review, it gives me 5-7 pages of slop, no references, a table that is formatted like garbage, and the bare minimum of insight. Claude is…

Read the full story at r/ChatGPT ↗

Timeline · 1 report

  1. 2026-09-14 13:47 · r/ChatGPT
    Does anyone else find that GPT Plus deep research is abysmal?

More stories

  1. AI's role in building AI surging? Anthropic says Claude now leads 26% of its R&D — Mint AI
  2. Hackers Used Anthropic’s Claude to Break Into OpenAI — Wall Street Journal Technology
  3. Anthropic adds support for the AGENTS.md instructions spec to Claude Code; OpenAI contributed AGENTS.md to the Agentic AI Foundation last year (Thomas Claburn/The Register) — Techmeme
  4. Claude, Anthropic’s AI model, is helping to develop the next version of itself — Fast Company AI
  5. Minimax H3 template Missing. — r/comfyui
  6. OpenAI ‘ethically hacked’ with help of Anthropic’s Claude chatbot — The Guardian AI
  7. Mathematicians Hate AI. They Can’t Quit It — Wired AI
  8. Anthropic Shifts Planned IPO to November — Wall Street Journal Technology

Get the daily brief of stories like this at 6:30 every morning →