AINewsnow

Has anyone found a reliable way to scan agent skills for security risks without drowning in false positives? I’m looking for something that can distinguish genuinely unsafe behavior from legitimate tool use, rather than flagging anything that looks suspicious in isolation.

We've spent way too much time looking into ways to check agent skills before using them and I still don't feel great about any of it. AI review can get prompt injected by the thing it's reviewing, scanners flag stuff the skill legitimately needs to do, and so many findings end up needing a manual r…

Read the full story at r/AI_Agents ↗

Timeline · 1 report

  1. 2026-09-27 02:14 · r/AI_Agents
    Has anyone found a reliable way to scan agent skills for security risks without drowning in false positives? I’m looking for something that can distinguish genuinely unsafe behavior from legitimate tool use, rather than flagging anything that looks suspicious in isolation.

More stories

  1. Introducing Gemini 3.8 Live with Live Avatar — Google Gemini Blog
  2. Accelerating vision-language models with LFM2.5-VL-DSpark — Hugging Face Blog
  3. OpenAI’s A.I. Went Rogue and Meddled With U.S. Government Websites — New York Times AI
  4. OpenAI agent hacked an Australian government healthcare website — New Scientist AI
  5. Unsecured OpenAI agents posted 53 user images on the internet without the lab's knowledge — TechCrunch AI
  6. Am I the only one who actually likes GPT-6 Sol and Luna? — r/ChatGPT
  7. Is Qwen Flash Next at like Q2 better than 27B at Q4? — r/LocalLLaMA
  8. Appeals Court Lets the Pentagon Designate Anthropic a Supply-Chain Risk — Wired AI

Get the daily brief of stories like this at 6:30 every morning →