Higher acceptance length, slower prose: Ling’s n=1/2/3 MTP test on one Spark
This story is from 2026-09-07. It is preserved in the archive; the latest stories are on the live feed.
The missing control is visible in sudoingX’s Ling-3.0-flash benchmark graphics. The earlier table leaves Ling’s no-speculation baseline as “not measured.” The later code/prose graphic fills it in: about 23 tok/s without the drafter, against 40.9 on code and 38.7 on prose with MTP n=1, at short prom…
Read the full story at r/LocalLLaMA ↗
Timeline · 1 report
- 2026-09-07 15:23 · r/LocalLLaMA
Higher acceptance length, slower prose: Ling’s n=1/2/3 MTP test on one Spark
More stories
- Anthropic, OpenAI, SpaceXAI, Google sued over call to ‘pace’ AI development — Politico Technology
- Gemini Hacked Three Companies in First Known Breakout by Google’s AI — Wall Street Journal Technology
- Alibaba ships Qwen3.8-Omni-Flash to watch, listen and call tools — r/LocalLLM
- NVIDIA CEO Jensen Huang rejects ‘AI will end the world’ claim, yet cautions ‘we should go as fast as we can but...’ — Mint AI
- Meet the Data Agent in ChatGPT Work — OpenAI YouTube
- AI hallucination of Chinese nuclear components almost led to US military attack — Ars Technica AI
- TypeSafe AI Releases Jev: A System One Model That Returns Typed, Calibrated Decisions Instead of Text — MarkTechPost
- AI's role in building AI surging? Anthropic says Claude now leads 26% of its R&D — Mint AI
Get the daily brief of stories like this at 6:30 every morning →