How did the Chinese labs catch up so fast if most of the early training work was in the US?
This story is from 2026-09-08. It is preserved in the archive; the latest stories are on the live feed.
OpenAI, Google, etc had a years long head start on training. Then DeepSeek and the other Chinese labs closed a lot of that gap in a much shorter window. How did they do this? I know open source papers and compute factor greatly. What I don't get is the data part of the equation. Besides US data lab…
Read the full story at r/ArtificialInteligence ↗
Timeline · 1 report
- 2026-09-08 17:46 · r/ArtificialInteligence
How did the Chinese labs catch up so fast if most of the early training work was in the US?
More stories
- I gave 6 different AIs the same 5 questions — r/AI_Agents
- Own 1 dashboard for ChatGPT, Gemini, Claude, and more for only $54.97 — Mashable AI
- Gemini 4 is good enough - JUST RELEASE IT — r/GeminiAI
- Prompt vs Architecture pt 2 — r/PromptEngineering
- OpenAI solves Navier-Stokes, Meta’s Muse a free AI agent that’s really good, DeepSeek V4.1 shrinks KV cache, and one doomer post causes OpenAI to consider pausing training + more AI news — ThursdAI
- Anthropic, OpenAI, SpaceXAI, Google sued over call to ‘pace’ AI development — Politico Technology
- Gemini Hacked Three Companies in First Known Breakout by Google’s AI — Wall Street Journal Technology
- Bolt Adds DeepSeek V4.1 Flash at 10x Cheaper Than V4 Pro — AlphaSignal
Get the daily brief of stories like this at 6:30 every morning →