I am a lawyer and made a small game: an AI summary of a real judgment with a few planted mistakes, and you catch them by highlighting the proof
Legal AI has learned to summarise. But has it learned how lawyers think? In my experience, AI summaries of judgments read well and still get things wrong, i.e. a holding stated too broadly, or a point the court rejected reported as accepted. So I made "Catch the AI". You read a real judgment, flag…
Read the full story at r/artificial ↗