I ran 22 memory-poisoning attacks against my AI agents' shared memory. Two got through.
I use more than one AI coding agent. Claude Code does most of the work, Codex and Cursor get the rest, and all three touch the same projects. For a while each one started every session knowing nothing, so I kept repeating myself: which port staging runs on, why we picked Postgres, that the test run…
Read the full story at DEV Community — AI ↗
Timeline · 2 reports
- 2026-11-10 18:42 · DEV Community — AI
My AI agents said "done". Git said otherwise. - 2026-11-10 17:13 · DEV Community — AI
I ran 22 memory-poisoning attacks against my AI agents' shared memory. Two got through.
More stories
- Gemini 4 Carbon is now available — Google DeepMind Blog
- Vicem v1.3.0: Reversible Repo Maps, AST Side-Effect Tags, and Honest Net-Token Benchmarks (0 Dependencies) — DEV Community — AI
- A One-Way Walkie-Talkie for the AI, and the Return Leg I Already Built — DEV Community — AI
- Agent Experience (AX) emerges as successor to Developer Experience amid AI agent boom — DEV Community — AI
- How does the SONAR MCP server work? — DEV Community — AI
- How to Turn Your API into an MCP Server Without Writing Server Code — DEV Community — AI
- MCP vs API: What's the Difference (and How DocStar Gives You Both) — DEV Community — AI
- The Agentic Developer Stack in 2026: Memory, Skills, MCP, and Lock-In-Free Workflows — DEV Community — AI
Get the daily brief of stories like this at 6:30 every morning →