If AI chatbots can't recognise when correct advice is dangerous, how safe are autonomous AI agents?
A recent study from NYU and the University of Wisconsin–Madison raised an interesting concern about AI safety. Researchers tested four AI chatbots on questions involving technology-facilitated domestic abuse. They found that 60% of assessed responses omitted critical safety warnings. For example, a…
Read the full story at r/AI_Agents ↗
Timeline · 1 report
- 2026-10-22 11:39 · r/AI_Agents
If AI chatbots can't recognise when correct advice is dangerous, how safe are autonomous AI agents?
More stories
- OlmoEarth v1.3: State-of-the-art embeddings for the whole planet — Allen Institute for AI (Ai2)
- Anthropic takes on Muse with Claude Duet, its new AI agent — The Verge AI
- Hugging Face’s New AI Biology Model Lets You Chat With DNA — Wired AI
- Enact, which develops full-stack tech for general-purpose robots, emerges from stealth with a $30M pre-seed from Mistral CEO Arthur Mensch, Yann LeCun, and more — Techmeme
- OpenAI agents disabled their own safety monitoring systems, with one lying about it — Financial Times AI
- Barclays to cut 5,000 jobs as bank steps up AI adoption — Financial Times AI
- AI Inbox Management: This Is Now a Thing — Salesforce AI Blog
- Websites go dark as AI exposes critical security flaws worldwide — RFI — Artificial Intelligence
Get the daily brief of stories like this at 6:30 every morning →