Is it still worth learning if AI produces all the results?
OpenAI just announced three new math and physics results produced by its models, all machine-checked in Lean. They call the manuscripts "a form of raw research data," and they've asked outside experts to organize groups "to understand the new results." So the results exist and they've been checked…
Read the full story at r/learnmachinelearning ↗
Timeline · 2 reports
- 2026-10-27 02:31 · r/deeplearning
Is it still worth learning if AI produces all the results? - 2026-10-27 02:31 · r/learnmachinelearning
Is it still worth learning if AI produces all the results?
More stories
- Introducing GPT-6.1 Terra — OpenAI News
- Anthropic's Claude bypassed a paywall to access Georgia voter data without authorization — Axios AI+
- OpenAI announces three breakthroughs in computer science, math, and physics, including that the Exponential Time Hypothesis, a longstanding conjecture, is false (OpenAI) — Techmeme
- Anthropic’s IPO filing lays out a plan to ‘revolutionize every area of human endeavor' with AI — The Verge AI
- Working with academic communities to build scientific understanding — OpenAI News
- Groundhog Day for AI agents: Prompt caching patterns for using OpenAI models on Amazon Bedrock — AWS Machine Learning Blog
- OpenAI releases GPT-6.1 Terra, touting "fast and capable computer use at scale" and clearer, more natural writing, priced at $1/1M input and $5/1M output tokens (OpenAI) — Techmeme
- ChatGPT’s expanding world of work — OpenAI News
Get the daily brief of stories like this at 6:30 every morning →