Llama vs Qwen vs DeepSeek: How Much VRAM Do You Need to Self-Host?
If you're moving an LLM from a cloud API to your own server, the first thing to calculate is VRAM, not which model scores best. The two VRAM consumers 1. Model weights : parameters × bytes per parameter. Precision Bytes per parameter 70B model FP16/BF16 2 ~140GB 8-bit 1 ~70GB 4-bit 0.5 ~35GB 2. KV…
Read the full story at DEV Community — AI ↗
Timeline · 1 report
- 2026-11-06 06:28 · DEV Community — AI
Llama vs Qwen vs DeepSeek: How Much VRAM Do You Need to Self-Host?
More stories
- Your AI models can change. Your memory shouldn't. — DEV Community — AI
- Blind listening test: 62 people compared 8-bar piano loops written by 8 LLMs (Gemini, Claude, Qwen, Kimi, Grok, GPT-6.1, DeepSeek, Llama). Interim results — r/artificial
- Config-Verified Comparison Maps How 10 Open MoE Models Route Tokens — MarkTechPost
- Llama-modchip: 284B DeepSeek on 64GB RAM, no GPU — Hacker News Front Page
- CyberTiel35BA3B working on Blender Rigging via MCP. 8GB VRAM, 16GB RAM. llama.cpp. — r/LocalLLaMA
- Zero-Downtime LLM Inference on Kubernetes Spot Instances (~70% GPU Cost Savings) — DEV Community — Machine Learning
- Llama 3.3 70B vs DeepSeek-V3: Open-Weight Frontier Benchmark, Reasoning Latency, and GPU Economics Showdown — DEV Community — Machine Learning
- Strata for all Qwen models from little to big — r/LocalLLaMA
Get the daily brief of stories like this at 6:30 every morning →