AINewsnow

LLMs: contratos minimos para revisar prompts

This story is from 2026-08-27. It is preserved in the archive; the latest stories are on the live feed.

Cuando un equipo dice que "ya reviso el prompt", casi nunca significa lo mismo para todos. Una persona mira tono. Otra mira si llama bien a las tools. Otra intenta imaginar riesgos de datos. El resultado suele ser un review un poco borroso, y el sistema queda aceptable pero dificil de operar cuando…

Read the full story at DEV Community — AI ↗

Timeline · 1 report

  1. 2026-08-27 02:24 · DEV Community — AI
    LLMs: contratos minimos para revisar prompts

More stories

  1. Qwen3.8-Flash-Next-Heretic2-IQ4XS on Halogen Flash Server vs llama-server on Strix Halo: 2.3-7.7x prefill speedup with half the VRAM (+ vision works on BYO GGUF) — r/LocalLLM
  2. M2 Mac ultra128gb Qwen flash next — r/LocalLLM
  3. Multi-hour llama.cpp optimization experiments on Qwen MoE models, patches, benchmarks, and reproduction guides — r/LocalLLM
  4. M1 Max 32GB, trying to run Qwen 3.8 27B at decent speeds and context — r/LocalLLaMA
  5. I turned an asymetric pair of Tesla V100s PCIe both (16 GB + 32 GB) into a surprisingly capable local LLM lab — 1.38k prompt tok/s, 40 decode tok/s with qwen3.8 27B Q6 and Q8... — r/LocalLLaMA
  6. [Guide / Weights] Qwen 3.8 27B on Intel Arc: Why IQ quants crawl at 8 tok/s, why Q4_K outpaces sub-4bpw on Battlemage, and clean RCO GGUFs (16GB & 24GB) — r/LocalLLM
  7. My Version of Jev running locally, playing doom. — r/LocalLLM
  8. Qwen3.8-27B on a single RTX 5090 (32GB) + 64GB DDR5-6000 — looking for real t/s numbers (llama.cpp / vLLM / sglang) — r/LocalLLM

Get the daily brief of stories like this at 6:30 every morning →