My AI-vs-human commit comparison had a control group of one day
This story is from 2026-10-15. It is preserved in the archive; the latest stories are on the live feed.
Ars Technica covered a Harvard working paper (Fiona Chen, James Stratton) built on about 300M work events from 700+ companies. After teams adopted coding agents, PRs went up 23% and code output about 30%, but issue resolution didn't move in a statistically significant way. Review was the bottleneck…
Read the full story at DEV Community — AI ↗
Timeline · 1 report
- 2026-10-15 14:52 · DEV Community — AI
My AI-vs-human commit comparison had a control group of one day