My scanner passed every local test, then 406'd on a real MCP server — that gap is the point
This story is from 2026-10-13. It is preserved in the archive; the latest stories are on the live feed.
I built a small passive scanner to check MCP servers. It is read-only: it will not run any of the server's tools, it will not touch your data. It just looks at the deployment and permission layer and hands you a report you can keep. To validate it, I ran it against two local target servers I wrote…
Read the full story at DEV Community — AI ↗
Timeline · 1 report
- 2026-10-13 13:43 · DEV Community — AI
My scanner passed every local test, then 406'd on a real MCP server — that gap is the point