Open models vs Claude: Kimi K3, GLM 5.3 and DeepSeek V4 Pro against Sonnet 5.5 and Opus 5.5
Originally published on the QuickSilver Pro blog . The usual reason to choose an open model over Claude is price. Now that every Claude model on QuickSilver Pro costs 75% less than Anthropic's list price, that reason needs checking again, and so does the question of what you give up in quality. So…
Read the full story at DEV Community — AI ↗
Timeline · 1 report
- 2026-11-06 01:44 · DEV Community — AI
Open models vs Claude: Kimi K3, GLM 5.3 and DeepSeek V4 Pro against Sonnet 5.5 and Opus 5.5
More stories
- Moonshot Just Put a 2.8-Trillion-Parameter Model on Hugging Face — Kimi K3.1 Pro's Open Weights Are Real, and the Fine Print Matters — DEV Community — AI
- Blind listening test: 62 people compared 8-bar piano loops written by 8 LLMs (Gemini, Claude, Qwen, Kimi, Grok, GPT-6.1, DeepSeek, Llama). Interim results — r/artificial
- MaxxBench (RLVR'd LLMs fail easy variants of DeepSWE tasks + obsess over "hidden tests" and pleasing the grader) — r/mlscaling
- This ChatGPT anime girl went viral on Chinese social media. I made a 3D version. — r/ChatGPT
- Harness Leaderboard - Kimi Code, Hermes, Pi, Claude Code, Codex, and Others Were Benchmarked Against Terminal Bench 2.1 & Deep SWE 1.1 — r/LocalLLaMA
- Lessons from putting 14 coding-agent CLIs behind one interface — DEV Community — AI
- Your AI models can change. Your memory shouldn't. — DEV Community — AI
- DeepSeek V4.1 Flash gains traction across local rigs, benchmarks, and serving platforms — Vercel Blog
Get the daily brief of stories like this at 6:30 every morning →