AINewsnow

Pangram's biggest flaw is users turning its scores into public shaming

This story is from 2026-09-03. It is preserved in the archive; the latest stories are on the live feed.

Pangram hired an "attack dog" to shame alleged AI users on social media. But the campaign blurs two things that aren't the same: Pangram only somewhat reliably measures whether AI was used, while the shaming implies the person didn't think or work on their own. A high AI score hits a text built on…

Read the full story at The Decoder ↗

Timeline · 1 report

  1. 2026-09-03 18:07 · The Decoder
    Pangram's biggest flaw is users turning its scores into public shaming

More stories

  1. Introducing Kimi K3 on Amazon Bedrock — AWS Machine Learning Blog
  2. Introducing Amazon SageMaker HyperPod Inference Gateway — AWS Machine Learning Blog
  3. Anthropic, OpenAI, SpaceXAI, Google sued over call to ‘pace’ AI development — Politico Technology
  4. Gemini Hacked Three Companies in First Known Breakout by Google’s AI — Wall Street Journal Technology
  5. Alibaba ships Qwen3.8-Omni-Flash to watch, listen and call tools — r/LocalLLM
  6. NVIDIA CEO Jensen Huang rejects ‘AI will end the world’ claim, yet cautions ‘we should go as fast as we can but...’ — Mint AI
  7. Meet the Data Agent in ChatGPT Work — OpenAI YouTube
  8. AI hallucination of Chinese nuclear components almost led to US military attack — Ars Technica AI

Get the daily brief of stories like this at 6:30 every morning →