Paper Q&A tools aren't remembering the literature. They're doing RAG.
A lot of paper-reading and literature Q&A tools now feel like chatting with an assistant that has already read the field. You ask a question, it answers in complete sentences, and it sometimes even points to sources. It's easy to walk away thinking the model has the whole library in its head. Usual…
Read the full story at DEV Community — AI ↗
Timeline · 1 report
- 2026-11-10 14:23 · DEV Community — AI
Paper Q&A tools aren't remembering the literature. They're doing RAG.