The new model was 59% cheaper and 75% faster. I still wouldn't ship it.
The migration looked like an obvious win on economics. In one EvalShift run, the candidate model was: 58.8% cheaper 75.2% faster 0 failed or truncated calls Run economics. Same 16 calls on both sides, no failures, and every number a finance reviewer cares about moved the right way. Then the migrati…
Read the full story at DEV Community — AI ↗
Timeline · 1 report
- 2026-11-12 21:05 · DEV Community — AI
The new model was 59% cheaper and 75% faster. I still wouldn't ship it.