Transcript cleanup needs an editing policy, not a global filler-word filter
This story is from 2026-09-14. It is preserved in the archive; the latest stories are on the live feed.
A text-cleaning step can quietly change what a speaker meant. Consider this invented example: I sent fifteen—no, fifty invitations. Um, I haven’t received a reply. Removing an empty “um” may fit a clean-verbatim brief. Deleting the self-correction or “haven’t” changes the statement. Treating every…
Read the full story at DEV Community — AI ↗
Timeline · 1 report
- 2026-09-14 09:04 · DEV Community — AI
Transcript cleanup needs an editing policy, not a global filler-word filter