We ran 2 vs 4 agents six times. Four agents cost 2.1 and did not improve success
This story is from 2026-09-22. It is preserved in the archive; the latest stories are on the live feed.
Short version: I ran a preregistered 2-agent versus 4-agent comparison on a deterministic task. Six live runs completed under hard caps. Both groups succeeded in exactly one of three repeats. The 4-agent group cost 2.115× more per run and per complete success. More agents were operationally viable;…
Read the full story at DEV Community — AI ↗
Timeline · 1 report
- 2026-09-22 21:51 · DEV Community — AI
We ran 2 vs 4 agents six times. Four agents cost 2.1 and did not improve success
More stories
- GPT-6 Sol and Luna now available on AI Gateway — Vercel Blog
- Anthropic launches Claude Opus 5.5 with stricter safeguards for cybersecurity — The Verge AI
- Amazon blocks Meta’s Muse AI agent — The Verge AI
- Alibaba Unveils New AI Chip, Outlines Plan for Larger Model — Wall Street Journal Technology
- Moonshot’s Kimi K3 lands on Amazon in key test for Chinese open-source AI revenue — South China Morning Post Tech
- How Benchling secured multi-tenant AI agents with Amazon Bedrock AgentCore — AWS Machine Learning Blog
- Meet the Data Agent in ChatGPT Work — OpenAI YouTube
- Systems for Machine Learning[D] — r/MachineLearning
Get the daily brief of stories like this at 6:30 every morning →