We thought exact match was enough for LLM evals. It wasn't.
This story is from 2026-10-28. It is preserved in the archive; the latest stories are on the live feed.
We run a service that reads research manuscripts and answers questions editors actually act on. Is there an ethical approval statement? Does the paper mention a clinical trial registration? Are figure references consistent? Is the self-citation rate too high? Each question is a separate check, and…
Read the full story at DEV Community — Machine Learning ↗
Timeline · 1 report
- 2026-10-28 04:02 · DEV Community — Machine Learning
We thought exact match was enough for LLM evals. It wasn't.