AINewsnow

We Thought the LLM Was Wrong. Our Safety Detector Was Wrong.

This story is from 2026-09-22. It is preserved in the archive; the latest stories are on the live feed.

There is a hidden dependency in a lot of LLM safety benchmarks: the detector. You send an adversarial prompt to a model, collect its response, and then some classifier decides whether that response represents refusal, compliance, or ambiguity. Eventually those classifications become percentages in…

Read the full story at DEV Community — AI ↗

Timeline · 1 report

  1. 2026-09-22 06:35 · DEV Community — AI
    We Thought the LLM Was Wrong. Our Safety Detector Was Wrong.

More stories

  1. Higgsfield AI ships new video features in a day with GPT-6 Astra — OpenAI News
  2. Alibaba Unveils AI Chip to Drive Global Data Center Buildout — Bloomberg AI
  3. Amazon blocks Meta’s Muse AI agent — The Verge AI
  4. British Columbia Sues OpenAI Over Canada Mass Shooting Warning Failure — Bloomberg AI
  5. Xiaomi debuts open-weight omnimodal models MiMo-V2.6 Pro and Flash; Pro allegedly performs "on par with Opus 5 and GPT-5.6 Sol across most agent benchmarks" (Xiaomi) — Techmeme
  6. Moonshot’s Kimi K3 lands on Amazon in key test for Chinese open-source AI revenue — South China Morning Post Tech
  7. Lawsuit accuses Anthropic, OpenAI, SpaceXAI, Google of AI pacing 'collusion' — The Hill Technology
  8. Grok 4.7 — Hacker News Front Page

Get the daily brief of stories like this at 6:30 every morning →