What if NeurIPS, ICML, and ICLR capped accepted papers at 1,000 each? [D]
With submissions to the big three ML conferences increasing rapidly, what if each conference imposed a hard cap of 1,000 accepted papers per year? Would this improve research quality, or simply make acceptance more arbitrary and competitive?
Read the full story at r/MachineLearning ↗
Timeline · 1 report
- 2026-11-12 16:02 · r/MachineLearning
What if NeurIPS, ICML, and ICLR capped accepted papers at 1,000 each? [D]
More stories
- The phantom life of Alice Huang, alleged Chinese spy who had affair with Nvidia CEO — CSET Georgetown
- Introducing Gemini 4 Hydrogen — Google DeepMind Blog
- Google's Gemini app now available on Apple CarPlay — Google AI Blog
- Anthropic launches Claude Fable 5.2 and Claude for Manufacturing — Anthropic (X)
- AWS releases local emulator of 200+ services written entirely by AI agents — AWS Machine Learning Blog
- Security firm says Grok-built apps exposed data from thousands of users, including SpaceXSI — Ars Technica AI
- OpenAI's quarterly revenue reportedly crosses $10 billion as losses widen — The Information AI
- United Airlines bans third-party AI agents from booking flights — Computerworld AI
Get the daily brief of stories like this at 6:30 every morning →