Why Perplexity citations break the moment you paste them (and what to do about it)
This story is from 2026-09-07. It is preserved in the archive; the latest stories are on the live feed.
A Perplexity answer is worth reading because of the little numbered chips scattered through it. Take those away and you are left with confident prose from an unnamed source — which is exactly what you get when you select an answer, hit Ctrl+C, and paste it into a document. I kept hitting this while…
Read the full story at DEV Community — AI ↗
Timeline · 1 report
- 2026-09-07 08:02 · DEV Community — AI
Why Perplexity citations break the moment you paste them (and what to do about it)
More stories
- Getting more accurate results - personalizations — r/ArtificialInteligence
- Opti 27B: Qwen3.8-27B in 11.8 GB at 3.47 bpw, within 0.5% of FP16 perplexity and matching Q4_K_M at 30% fewer bytes. Patched llama.cpp runtime, source public, reproduce with one command — r/LocalLLM
- claude, chatgpt, kimi or perplexity subscription (end of 2026) — r/ArtificialInteligence
- Perplexity’s AI agents helped build a database. They weren’t allowed to run it. — The New Stack AI
- Google Joins OpenAI, Anthropic, Meta in Disclosing AI Hacks — Bloomberg AI
- Alibaba ships Qwen3.8-Omni-Flash to watch, listen and call tools — r/LocalLLM
- Anthropic, OpenAI, SpaceXAI, Google sued over call to ‘pace’ AI development — Politico Technology
- AI's role in building AI surging? Anthropic says Claude now leads 26% of its R&D — Mint AI
Get the daily brief of stories like this at 6:30 every morning →