You bench AI reviewers on a 1% sample because the judge is expensive. That's the whole bug.
A week ago I wrote that an AI reviewer reporting 96% precision had a measurement nobody ran: recall. The reaction was mostly "sure, someone picked a flattering metric." I want to make a wider claim this time. The precision-only score is a symptom of a structural problem in how everybody evals code…
Read the full story at DEV Community — Machine Learning ↗
Timeline · 1 report
- 2026-09-22 00:15 · DEV Community — Machine Learning
You bench AI reviewers on a 1% sample because the judge is expensive. That's the whole bug.