AINewsnow

Base Rate Neglect: Why Your "95% Accurate" Alert Is Wrong 99% of the Time

In 1978, researchers asked 60 people at Harvard Medical School a single question. A disease affects 1 in 1,000 people. The test for it has a 5% false positive rate. A patient tests positive. What's the chance they actually have it? The most common answer was 95%. The right answer is about 2%. Only…

Read the full story at DEV Community — Machine Learning ↗

Timeline · 1 report

  1. 2026-10-03 22:17 · DEV Community — Machine Learning
    Base Rate Neglect: Why Your "95% Accurate" Alert Is Wrong 99% of the Time

More stories

  1. NVIDIA DGX Spark 64GB Gives Developers More Ways to Build and Scale Local AI — NVIDIA Blog
  2. Guided Vision in Gemini Live: built for accessibility — Google Gemini Blog
  3. Google tests its plan for AI data centers in space with Project Suncatcher — Scientific American
  4. OpenAI DevDay 2026 Keynote (FULL) — OpenAI YouTube
  5. A model guide for the GPT-6 family — OpenAI News
  6. The latest AI news we announced in September 2026 — Google AI Blog
  7. Introducing Olmo-core 3: Open, scalable training infrastructure for large MoEs — Allen Institute for AI (Ai2)
  8. OpenAI Fires Researchers for Allegedly Sharing Information with AI Safety Group — Wall Street Journal Technology

Get the daily brief of stories like this at 6:30 every morning →