Testing the tool call after the HTTP success
This story is from 2026-10-04. It is preserved in the archive; the latest stories are on the live feed.
HTTP 200 doesn't mean the client got a good tool call. A nested integer can arrive as a string, a streamed call can lose a fragment, or a later assistant turn can ignore the tool result. The traces for these protocol mistakes can be awkward. I built toolcall-check, a Python CLI that checks these be…
Read the full story at DEV Community — AI ↗
Timeline · 1 report
- 2026-10-04 20:07 · DEV Community — AI
Testing the tool call after the HTTP success